↓ Skip to main content

Direct microbial conversion

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, March 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Direct microbial conversion
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, March 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02920576
Authors

D. A. Hogsett, H. -J. Ahn, T. D. Bernardez, R. South, L. R. Lynd

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 29%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 43%
Engineering 2 29%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1999.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#542
of 2,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,441
of 18,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,511 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.