| Title |
Using QALYs in Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PharmacoEconomics, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/11588250-000000000-00000 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martina Garau, Koonal K. Shah, Anne R. Mason, Qing Wang, Adrian Towse, Michael F. Drummond |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 25% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 17 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2018.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#570
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,325
of 189,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#107
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.