↓ Skip to main content

Exploring the oxidative stress response mechanism triggered by environmental water samples

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploring the oxidative stress response mechanism triggered by environmental water samples
Published in
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts, January 2017
DOI 10.1039/c6em00541a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peta A. Neale, Maud E. S. Achard, Beate I. Escher, Frederic D. L. Leusch

Abstract

Environmental waters can contain a wide range of micropollutants. Bioanalytical test batteries using assays indicative of different stages of cellular toxicity pathways, such as adaptive stress responses, have been applied to a range of water samples. Oxidative stress response assays have proven to be sensitive tools, but the mechanism by which water samples are inducing the oxidative stress response remains unclear because both electrophiles and reactive oxygen species (ROS) may activate the Nrf2-antioxidant response element (ARE) pathway. The current study aimed to explore the underlying mechanisms of the oxidative stress response triggered by exposure to surface water extracts previously shown to be active in the ARE GeneBLAzer oxidative stress response assay. ROS formation and changes in glutathione (GSH) concentration were assessed in human liver cells exposed to water extracts from a large river in addition to individual chemicals that were detected in these water extracts and reported to be active in the ARE GeneBLAzer assay in a previous study. Many of the surface water samples induced ROS formation and decreased the GSH to glutathione disulfide (GSSG) ratio, suggesting that the formation of ROS is an important mechanism. However, some of the most responsive samples in the ARE GeneBLAzer assay, as well as the individual chemicals, did not have a significant effect on either ROS formation or the GSH/GSSG ratio, suggesting a different mechanism. Antioxidants can also induce the Nrf2-ARE pathway and the ARE GeneBLAzer assay may also detect compounds that activate ARE by Nrf2-independent mechanisms, thus further research is required to characterise active chemicals in oxidative stress response assays. However, these tests are still useful for quantifying the integrated cellular response to multiple molecular initiating events and can be used complementary to assays indicative of specific effects, such as receptor-mediated assays.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Researcher 5 17%
Student > Master 4 13%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Engineering 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,441,896
of 25,756,911 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#544
of 1,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,259
of 424,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts
#22
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,872 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.