| Title |
Neutral models for the analysis of broad-scale landscape pattern
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape Ecology, July 1987
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02275262 |
| Authors |
Robert H. Gardner, Bruce T. Milne, Monica G. Turnei, Robert V. O'Neill |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 528 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 4% |
| Brazil | 11 | 2% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 465 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 139 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 108 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 62 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 40 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 91 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 189 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 176 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 47 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 18 | 3% |
| Unknown | 81 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,293,687
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#297
of 1,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#634
of 12,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.