↓ Skip to main content

Risk Factors for Bronchiectasis in Children with Cystic Fibrosis

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
515 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
289 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk Factors for Bronchiectasis in Children with Cystic Fibrosis
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, May 2013
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1301725
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D Sly, Catherine L Gangell, Linping Chen, Robert S Ware, Sarath Ranganathan, Lauren S Mott, Conor P Murray, Stephen M Stick

Abstract

Bronchiectasis develops early in the course of cystic fibrosis, being detectable in infants as young as 10 weeks of age, and is persistent and progressive. We sought to determine risk factors for the onset of bronchiectasis, using data collected by the Australian Respiratory Early Surveillance Team for Cystic Fibrosis (AREST CF) intensive surveillance program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 289 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 281 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 17%
Researcher 45 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Master 28 10%
Other 20 7%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 66 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 3%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 74 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#801,628
of 24,493,053 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#8,539
of 31,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,893
of 199,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#131
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,493,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.