↓ Skip to main content

Teaching about complex systems is no simple matter: building effective professional development for computer-supported complex systems instruction

Overview of attention for article published in Instructional Science, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Teaching about complex systems is no simple matter: building effective professional development for computer-supported complex systems instruction
Published in
Instructional Science, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11251-016-9388-7
Authors

Susan A. Yoon, Emma Anderson, Jessica Koehler-Yom, Chad Evans, Miyoung Park, Josh Sheldon, Ilana Schoenfeld, Daniel Wendel, Hal Scheintaub, Eric Klopfer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 19 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 29%
Arts and Humanities 9 11%
Psychology 5 6%
Computer Science 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 19 22%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2017.
All research outputs
#14,296,476
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Instructional Science
#278
of 465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,505
of 332,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Instructional Science
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 465 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.