↓ Skip to main content

Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
Title
Alternatives to animal testing: current status and future perspectives
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00204-011-0718-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manfred Liebsch, Barbara Grune, Andrea Seiler, Daniel Butzke, Michael Oelgeschläger, Ralph Pirow, Sarah Adler, Christian Riebeling, Andreas Luch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 292 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 21%
Researcher 41 14%
Student > Master 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 72 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 9%
Engineering 19 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 5%
Other 65 22%
Unknown 84 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,196,633
of 25,376,589 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#251
of 2,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,345
of 123,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,589 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.