↓ Skip to main content

Large herbivores in sagebrush steppe ecosystems: livestock and wild ungulates influence structure and function

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Large herbivores in sagebrush steppe ecosystems: livestock and wild ungulates influence structure and function
Published in
Oecologia, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00442-007-0689-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. Manier, N. Thompson Hobbs

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Argentina 2 1%
China 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 133 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Student > Master 26 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 15 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 58 40%
Environmental Science 46 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 25 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,300,273
of 24,831,063 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,763
of 4,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,662
of 86,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,831,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.