| Title |
Ineffectiveness of pruning to control citrus huanglongbing caused by Candidatus Liberibacter americanus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plant Pathology, June 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10658-007-9173-1 |
| Authors |
Silvio Aparecido Lopes, Guilherme Fernando Frare, Pedro Takao Yamamoto, Antonio Juliano Ayres, José Carlos Barbosa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 10 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#317
of 943 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,914
of 70,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 943 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.