↓ Skip to main content

Examination of the responses of different genotypes of citrus to huanglongbing (citrus greening) under different conditions.

Overview of attention for article published in Phytopathology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
265 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examination of the responses of different genotypes of citrus to huanglongbing (citrus greening) under different conditions.
Published in
Phytopathology, December 2009
DOI 10.1094/phyto-99-12-1346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Svetlana Y Folimonova, Cecile J Robertson, Stephen M Garnsey, Siddarame Gowda, William O Dawson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 205 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 48 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 21%
Student > Master 34 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 31 14%
Unknown 28 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 150 70%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Engineering 3 1%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 32 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,726,418
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Phytopathology
#408
of 2,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,860
of 165,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytopathology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,749 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them