↓ Skip to main content

The knowledge gap in expanded newborn screening: Survey results from paediatricians in Massachusetts

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
The knowledge gap in expanded newborn screening: Survey results from paediatricians in Massachusetts
Published in
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10545-005-0135-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Gennaccaro, S. E. Waisbren, D. Marsden

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 28%
Researcher 4 16%
Other 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#691
of 1,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,101
of 147,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,849 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.