↓ Skip to main content

Energy storage in the geological subsurface: dimensioning, risk analysis and spatial planning: the ANGUS+ project

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Earth Sciences, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Energy storage in the geological subsurface: dimensioning, risk analysis and spatial planning: the ANGUS+ project
Published in
Environmental Earth Sciences, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12665-016-6319-5
Authors

Alina Kabuth, Andreas Dahmke, Christof Beyer, Lars Bilke, Frank Dethlefsen, Peter Dietrich, Rainer Duttmann, Markus Ebert, Volker Feeser, Uwe-Jens Görke, Ralf Köber, Wolfgang Rabbel, Tom Schanz, Dirk Schäfer, Hilke Würdemann, Sebastian Bauer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 150 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Master 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Professor 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 55 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 16%
Engineering 21 14%
Environmental Science 11 7%
Energy 10 7%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 69 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,409,087
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Earth Sciences
#156
of 1,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,281
of 423,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Earth Sciences
#7
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,802 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.