↓ Skip to main content

Effects of sulfur dioxide, ozone, and their interactions on ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plant Pathology, July 1975
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Effects of sulfur dioxide, ozone, and their interactions on ‘Golden Delicious’ apple trees
Published in
European Journal of Plant Pathology, July 1975
DOI 10.1007/bf01976808
Authors

W. J. Kender, F. H. F. G. Spierings

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1978.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#347
of 1,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,037
of 4,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plant Pathology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,021 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them