↓ Skip to main content

Analysis and quantification of prescribing and transcription errors in a paediatric oncology service

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Analysis and quantification of prescribing and transcription errors in a paediatric oncology service
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, February 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1014814713203
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Pichon, L. Vodoz, G.L. Zelger, P. Wacker, J. Humbert

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 19%
Chemistry 2 13%
Computer Science 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2007.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#632
of 1,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,340
of 132,993 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,993 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them