↓ Skip to main content

Similar early characteristics but variable neurological outcome of patients with a de novo mutation of KCNQ2

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Similar early characteristics but variable neurological outcome of patients with a de novo mutation of KCNQ2
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-8-80
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathieu Milh, Nadia Boutry-Kryza, Julie Sutera-Sardo, Cyril Mignot, Stéphane Auvin, Caroline Lacoste, Nathalie Villeneuve, Agathe Roubertie, Bénédicte Heron, Maryline Carneiro, Anna Kaminska, Cécilia Altuzarra, Gaëlle Blanchard, Dorothée Ville, Marie Anne Barthez, Delphine Heron, Domitille Gras, Alexandra Afenjar, Nathalie Dorison, Dianne Doummar, Thierry Billette de Villemeur, Isabelle An, Aurélia Jacquette, Perrine Charles, Julie Perrier, Bertrand Isidor, Laurent Vercueil, Brigitte Chabrol, Catherine Badens, Gaétan Lesca, Laurent Villard

Abstract

Early onset epileptic encephalopathies (EOEEs) are dramatic heterogeneous conditions in which aetiology, seizures and/or interictal EEG have a negative impact on neurological development. Several genes have been associated with EOEE and a molecular diagnosis workup is challenging since similar phenotypes are associated with mutations in different genes and since mutations in one given gene can be associated with very different phenotypes. Recently, de novo mutations in KCNQ2, have been found in about 10% of EOEE patients. Our objective was to confirm that KCNQ2 was an important gene to include in the diagnosis workup of EOEEs and to fully describe the clinical and EEG features of mutated patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Other 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Other 25 30%
Unknown 10 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Neuroscience 12 14%
Unspecified 8 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,441
of 3,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,423
of 208,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#33
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.