You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Delays in publication of cost utility analyses conducted alongside clinical trials: registry analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.38079.502326.ae |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dan Greenberg, Allison B Rosen, Natalia V Olchanski, Patricia W Stone, John Nadai, Peter J Neumann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 31% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#38,936
of 64,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,917
of 62,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#136
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.