You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limitations in the use of commercial humic acids in water and soil research.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, May 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1021/es00151a009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ronald L. Malcolm, Patrick. MacCarthy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 25 | 25% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2009.
All research outputs
#5,447,195
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#6,056
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,141
of 127,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#378
of 2,112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.