↓ Skip to main content

Chlamydia Vaccines

Overview of attention for article published in BioDrugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Chlamydia Vaccines
Published in
BioDrugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/00063030-200216010-00003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph U. Igietseme, Carolyn M. Black, Harlan D. Caldwell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 4 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Unspecified 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2019.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BioDrugs
#179
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,203
of 186,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioDrugs
#50
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,054 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.