| Title |
Housing and health—Current issues and implications for research and programs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Urban Health, March 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf02350959 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas D. Matte, David E. Jacobs |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 10 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 26 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#4,726,418
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Urban Health
#510
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,064
of 40,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Urban Health
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.