↓ Skip to main content

Cost effectiveness of patient education for the prevention of falls in hospital: economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
219 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost effectiveness of patient education for the prevention of falls in hospital: economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medicine, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-135
Pubmed ID
Authors

Terry P Haines, Anne-Marie Hill, Keith D Hill, Sandra G Brauer, Tammy Hoffmann, Christopher Etherton-Beer, Steven M McPhail

Abstract

Falls are one of the most frequently occurring adverse events that impact upon the recovery of older hospital inpatients. Falls can threaten both immediate and longer-term health and independence. There is need to identify cost-effective means for preventing falls in hospitals. Hospital-based falls prevention interventions tested in randomized trials have not yet been subjected to economic evaluation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 217 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Researcher 25 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 53 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 20%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Other 36 16%
Unknown 61 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2013.
All research outputs
#6,311,540
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,419
of 3,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,920
of 197,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#47
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.