| Title |
Reproducibility of isokinetic leg strength and endurance characteristics of adult men and women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 1992
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00705085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. P. Gleeson, T. H. Mercer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 9 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1995.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,159
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,541
of 18,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 18,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them