↓ Skip to main content

Physiological factors in infantry operations

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 1990
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Physiological factors in infantry operations
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00839165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Knapik, William Daniels, Michelle Murphy, Patricia Fitzgerald, Frederick Drews, James Vogel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 12 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 17%
Engineering 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Linguistics 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1995.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#2,159
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,554
of 15,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 15,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.