↓ Skip to main content

Influence of education, marital status, occupation, and the place of living on skeletal status, fracture prevalence, and the course and effectiveness of osteoporotic therapy in women in the RAC-OST-POL…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Influence of education, marital status, occupation, and the place of living on skeletal status, fracture prevalence, and the course and effectiveness of osteoporotic therapy in women in the RAC-OST-POL Study
Published in
Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00774-013-0471-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wojciech Pluskiewicz, Piotr Adamczyk, Aleksandra Czekajło, Władysław Grzeszczak, Bogna Drozdzowska

Abstract

The RAC-OST-POL population-based, epidemiological study provided data concerning the influence of education, marital status, occupation, and the place of living (residence) on skeletal status, fracture prevalence, and the course and effectiveness of osteoporotic therapy in 625 women older than 55 years, all of them recruited from the District of Raciborz in Poland. Their mean age was 66.4 ± 7.8 years. All the women completed a specially designed questionnaire. The skeletal status was assessed by femoral neck (FN) and total hip (TH) densitometry, using a Lunar DPX system (USA). In univariate analyses, taking into consideration the age differences, bone mineralization was dependent on marital status (Z score for FN and TH was significantly higher in widows than in divorcees; p < 0.05), place of residence (better results in rural areas; p < 0.05), and occupation (better in standing than sitting jobs; p < 0.05 for FN Z score and p < 0.01 for TH Z score). The multivariate model allowed us to verify that only place of living and type of occupation had a significant influence on densitometry results. In direct comparison, fracture prevalence seemed to be borderline significantly more common in widows (33.5%) and least common among divorcees (11.8%) (χ(2) = 6.9, df = 3, p = 0.07), but reanalysis performed after age adjustment excluded a true impact of marital status on fracture occurrence. Other factors did not affect fracture occurrence. Some factors influenced the use of medications for osteoporosis: higher level of education was associated with a more frequent use of vitamin D (χ(2) = 8.49, df = 3, p < 0.05) and of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) (χ(2) = 35.7, df = 3, p < 0.00001). HRT was most commonly used by unmarried women (30%) and least commonly by divorcees (11.8%) (χ(2) = 11.7, df = 3, p = 0.01). Vitamin D was more often used among women from the urban area of Raciborz than by those from surrounding rural areas (χ(2) = 9.2, df = 1, p < 0.01). The frequency of use of the three aforementioned medications was associated with the character of occupation. Women with sedentary jobs demonstrated the highest frequency of intake for vitamin D (χ(2) = 9.92, df = 3, p < 0.05) and HRT (χ(2) = 19.48, df = 3, p < 0.001) as well as for other antiresorptive medications (χ(2) = 8.18, df = 3, p < 0.05). We concluded that the results of the epidemiological study demonstrate that both skeletal status and use of antiosteoporotic medications were partially modified by analyzed social factors, whereas fracture prevalence was generally independent from those factors. These data suggest that education, marital status, place of living, and type of occupation may have impacts on implementation of osteoporosis-preventing health programs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Researcher 4 14%
Lecturer 2 7%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 14%
Psychology 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2013.
All research outputs
#18,565,966
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#443
of 787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,372
of 197,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.