↓ Skip to main content

Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, March 1986
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect
Published in
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, March 1986
DOI 10.1007/bf00987204
Authors

Miles L. Patterson, Jack L. Powell, Mary G. Lenihan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
France 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Professor 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 34%
Computer Science 5 11%
Neuroscience 4 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
#263
of 424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,953
of 10,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nonverbal Behavior
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them