↓ Skip to main content

Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
401 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
324 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Foreign language knowledge can influence native language performance in exclusively native contexts
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, December 2002
DOI 10.3758/bf03196335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janet G. van Hell, Ton Dijkstra

Abstract

In three experiments, we studied the influence of foreign language knowledge on native language performance in an exclusively native language context. Trilinguals with Dutch as their native and dominant language (L1), English as their second language (L2), and French as their third language (L3) performed a word association task (Experiment 1) or a lexical decision task (Experiments 2 and 3) in L1. The L1 stimulus words were cognates with their translations in English, cognates with their translations in French, or were noncognates. In Experiments 1 and 2 with trilinguals who were highly proficient in English and relatively low in proficiency in French, we observed shorter word association and lexical decision times to the L1 words that were cognates with English than to the noncognates. In these relatively low-proficiency French speakers, response times (RTs) for the L1 words that were cognates with French did not differ from those for the noncognates. In Experiment 3, we tested Dutch-English-French trilinguals with a higher level of fluency in French (i.e., equally fluent in English and in French). We now observed faster responses on the L1 words that were cognates with French than on the noncognates. Lexical decision times to the cognates with English were also shorter than those to then oncognates. The results indicate that words presented in the dominant language, to naive participants, activate information in the nontarget, and weaker, language in parallel, implying that the multilinguals' processing system is profoundly nonselective with respect to language. A minimal level of nontarget language fluency seems to be required, however, before any weaker language effects become noticeable in L1 processing.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 324 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 5%
Netherlands 4 1%
Germany 3 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 290 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 21%
Student > Master 65 20%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 50 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 118 36%
Psychology 91 28%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Neuroscience 14 4%
Arts and Humanities 11 3%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 60 19%