| Title |
The Role of Affect in Cross-Cultural Negotiations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of International Business Studies, December 1998
|
| DOI | 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490051 |
| Authors |
Jennifer M. George, Gareth R. Jones, Jorge A. Gonzalez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 49 | 46% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 10% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Business Studies
#333
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,848
of 100,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Business Studies
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them