| Title |
Evolutionary ecology and the use of natural selection in ecological theory
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the History of Biology, June 1986
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00138879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James P. Collins |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Brazil | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 30% |
| Researcher | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 54 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Biology
#191
of 500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,008
of 10,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Biology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.