↓ Skip to main content

Artificial selection for short and long attack latencies in wildMus musculus domesticus

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, March 1981
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
224 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Artificial selection for short and long attack latencies in wildMus musculus domesticus
Published in
Behavior Genetics, March 1981
DOI 10.1007/bf01065622
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. A. van Oortmerssen, Th. C. M. Bakker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Master 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 48%
Psychology 9 10%
Engineering 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2011.
All research outputs
#4,728,388
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#244
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#690
of 7,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.