↓ Skip to main content

Philosophy and computational neuroanatomy

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, March 1994
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Philosophy and computational neuroanatomy
Published in
Philosophical Studies, March 1994
DOI 10.1007/bf01207659
Authors

Christopher Cherniak

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Linguistics 2 18%
Philosophy 2 18%
Psychology 2 18%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#271
of 1,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,539
of 22,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them