| Title |
Foraging behaviour of Weddell seals, and its ecological implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Polar Biology, December 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s003000100297 |
| Authors |
Joachim Pl�tz, Rainer Knust, Alexander Schr�der, Marthan Bester, Horst Bornemann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 109 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 19% |
| Unknown | 5 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 71% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | <1% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Polar Biology
#600
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,073
of 124,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Polar Biology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them