↓ Skip to main content

Stress physiology in marine mammals: how well do they fit the terrestrial model?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
Title
Stress physiology in marine mammals: how well do they fit the terrestrial model?
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00360-015-0901-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shannon Atkinson, Daniel Crocker, Dorian Houser, Kendall Mashburn

Abstract

Stressors are commonly accepted as the causal factors, either internal or external, that evoke physiological responses to mediate the impact of the stressor. The majority of research on the physiological stress response, and costs incurred to an animal, has focused on terrestrial species. This review presents current knowledge on the physiology of the stress response in a lesser studied group of mammals, the marine mammals. Marine mammals are an artificial or pseudo grouping from a taxonomical perspective, as this group represents several distinct and diverse orders of mammals. However, they all are fully or semi-aquatic animals and have experienced selective pressures that have shaped their physiology in a manner that differs from terrestrial relatives. What these differences are and how they relate to the stress response is an efflorescent topic of study. The identification of the many facets of the stress response is critical to marine mammal management and conservation efforts. Anthropogenic stressors in marine ecosystems, including ocean noise, pollution, and fisheries interactions, are increasing and the dramatic responses of some marine mammals to these stressors have elevated concerns over the impact of human-related activities on a diverse group of animals that are difficult to monitor. This review covers the physiology of the stress response in marine mammals and places it in context of what is known from research on terrestrial mammals, particularly with respect to mediator activity that diverges from generalized terrestrial models. Challenges in conducting research on stress physiology in marine mammals are discussed and ways to overcome these challenges in the future are suggested.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 249 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 18%
Student > Master 40 16%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Researcher 30 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 52 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 39%
Environmental Science 34 14%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 18 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 25 10%
Unknown 62 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#5,165,711
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#117
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,062
of 269,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them