| Title |
Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-013-3002-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert L. Barrack, Erin L. Ruh, Jiajing Chen, Adolph V. Lombardi, Keith R. Berend, Javad Parvizi, Craig J. Della Valle, William G. Hamilton, Ryan M. Nunley |
| Abstract |
Few data exist regarding the impact of socioeconomic factors on results of current TKA in young patients. Predictors of TKA outcomes have focused primarily on surgical technique, implant details, and individual patient clinical factors. The relative importance of these factors compared to patient socioeconomic status is not known. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 167 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 38 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 55 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,011,969
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#104
of 7,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,471
of 207,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#2
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.