| Title |
A critique of the WHO TobReg's "Advisory Note" report entitled: "Waterpipe tobacco smoking: health effects, research needs and recommended actions by regulators"
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-5751-5-17 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kamal Chaouachi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Jordan | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 11 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 37% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,122,120
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#35
of 112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,996
of 152,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Negative Results in BioMedicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 112 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.