↓ Skip to main content

Use of a Modified Informed Consent Process among Vulnerable Patients: A Descriptive Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
connotea
2 Connotea
Title
Use of a Modified Informed Consent Process among Vulnerable Patients: A Descriptive Study
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2006
DOI 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00535.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rebecca L. Sudore, C. Seth Landefeld, Brie A. Williams, Deborah E. Barnes, Karla Lindquist, Dean Schillinger

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 179 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Master 22 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Other 50 27%
Unknown 32 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 35%
Social Sciences 23 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 8%
Psychology 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 41 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,427
of 8,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,329
of 92,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#55
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,173 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.