| Title |
QTL mapping with near-isogenic lines in maize
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-007-0512-6 |
| Authors |
S. J. Szalma, B. M. Hostert, J. R. LeDeaux, C. W. Stuber, J. B. Holland |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 29% |
| Researcher | 27 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 79% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2009.
All research outputs
#7,845,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#1,366
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,231
of 78,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.