↓ Skip to main content

Non–AIDS-Defining Malignancies in Patients with HIV in the HAART Era

Overview of attention for article published in Current Infectious Disease Reports, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Non–AIDS-Defining Malignancies in Patients with HIV in the HAART Era
Published in
Current Infectious Disease Reports, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11908-009-0075-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Minh Ly Nguyen, Kevin James Farrell, Clifford James Gunthel

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Libya 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Postgraduate 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2010.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#167
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,997
of 165,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Infectious Disease Reports
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.