↓ Skip to main content

Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, March 1976
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 2,265)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
14 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
702 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
Title
Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, March 1976
DOI 10.1007/bf01405862
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Teasdale, B. Jennett

Abstract

The Glasgow Coma Scale, based upon eye opening, verbal and motor responses has proved a practical and consistent means of monitoring the state of head injured patients. Observations made in the early stages after injury define the depth and duration of coma and, when combined with clinical features such as a patient's age and brain stem function, have been used to predict outcome. Series of cases in comparable depths of coma in Glasgow and the Netherlands showed remarkably similar outcomes at 3 months. Based upon observations made in the first 24 hours of coma after injury, data from 255 previous cases reliably predicted outcome in the majority of 92 new patients. The exceptions were patients with potential to recover who later developed complications: no patient did significantly better than predicted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 248 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 15%
Researcher 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Other 16 6%
Other 54 21%
Unknown 53 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 35%
Psychology 28 11%
Neuroscience 18 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 6%
Engineering 8 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 72 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,226,640
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#19
of 2,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53
of 4,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 4,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them