| Title |
Treatment of Chronic Non-Malignant Pain in the Elderly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Safety, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/00002018-200932060-00003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Bruce Barber, Stephen J. Gibson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 131 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 16% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 37% |
| Psychology | 12 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2015.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#594
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,137
of 194,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#201
of 764 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,137 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 764 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.