↓ Skip to main content

Methodological and ethical issues in child abuse research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Family Violence, September 1987
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Methodological and ethical issues in child abuse research
Published in
Journal of Family Violence, September 1987
DOI 10.1007/bf00976542
Authors

E. Jane Bradley, R. C. L. Lindsay

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Lecturer 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Social Sciences 2 18%
Unknown 2 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1993.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family Violence
#520
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,441
of 12,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family Violence
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them