↓ Skip to main content

The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project: Description of a Multi-Institutional Collaboration to Identify Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
186 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project: Description of a Multi-Institutional Collaboration to Identify Environmental Risk Factors for Breast Cancer
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, August 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1016387020854
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marilie D. Gammon, Alfred I. Neugut, Regina M. Santella, Susan L. Teitelbaum, Julie A. Britton, Mary Beth Terry, Sybil M. Eng, Mary S. Wolff, Steven D. Stellman, Geoffrey C. Kabat, Bruce Levin, H. Leon Bradlow, Maureen Hatch, Jan Beyea, David Camann, Martin Trent, Ruby T. Senie, Gail C. Garbowski, Carla Maffeo, Pat Montalvan, Gertrud S. Berkowitz, Margaret Kemeny, Marc Citron, Freya Schnabel, Allan Schuss, Steven Hajdu, Vincent Vincguerra, Gwen W. Collman, G. Iris Obrams

Abstract

The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project is a federally mandated, population-based case-control study to determine whether breast cancer risk among women in the counties of Nassau and Suffolk, NY, is associated with selected environmental exposures, assessed by blood samples, self-reports, and environmental home samples. This report describes the collaborative project's background, rationale, methods, participation rates, and distributions of known risk factors for breast cancer by case-control status, by blood donation, and by availability of environmental home samples. Interview response rates among eligible cases and controls were 82.1% (n = 1,508) and 62.8% (n = 1,556), respectively. Among case and control respondents who completed the interviewer-administered questionnaire, 98.2 and 97.6% self-completed the food frequency questionnaire; 73.0 and 73.3% donated a blood sample; and 93.0 and 83.3% donated a urine sample. Among a random sample of case and control respondents who are long-term residents, samples of dust (83.6 and 83.0%); soil (93.5 and 89.7%); and water (94.3 and 93.9%) were collected. Established risk factors for breast cancer that were found to increase risk among Long Island women include lower parity, late age at first birth, little or no breast feeding, and family history of breast cancer. Factors that were found to be associated with a decreased likelihood that a respondent would donate blood include increasing age and past smoking; factors associated with an increased probability include white or other race, alcohol use, ever breastfed, ever use of hormone replacement therapy, ever use of oral contraceptives, and ever had a mammogram. Long-term residents (defined as 15+ years in the interview home) with environmental home samples did not differ from other long-term residents, although there were a number of differences in risk factor distributions between long-term residents and other participants, as anticipated.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 13%
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Environmental Science 6 8%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 16 21%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2019.
All research outputs
#906,275
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#102
of 4,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#701
of 44,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.