↓ Skip to main content

Autoshaping i.v. cocaine self-administration in rats: effects of nondrug alternative reinforcers on acquisition

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, January 1993
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Autoshaping i.v. cocaine self-administration in rats: effects of nondrug alternative reinforcers on acquisition
Published in
Psychopharmacology, January 1993
DOI 10.1007/bf02246944
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marilyn E. Carroll, Sylvie T. Lac

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 32%
Psychology 9 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 1997.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#2,100
of 5,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,118
of 65,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.