↓ Skip to main content

Variation in staging and treatment of local and regional breast cancer in the elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Variation in staging and treatment of local and regional breast cancer in the elderly
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, February 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf01806004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bruce E. Hillner, Lynne Penberthy, Christopher E. Desch, M. Kathleen McDonald, Thomas J. Smith, Sheldon M. Retchin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 58%
Social Sciences 3 12%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 4 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2000.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,664
of 4,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,989
of 79,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.