↓ Skip to main content

Why Do Patients of Female Physicians Have Higher Rates of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Why Do Patients of Female Physicians Have Higher Rates of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening?
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, January 1997
DOI 10.1007/s11606-006-0005-3
Authors

Nicole Lurie, Karen L. Margolis, Paul G. McGovern, Pamela J. Mink, Jonathan S. Slater

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Nigeria 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 42%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,513
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,878
of 94,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.