↓ Skip to main content

Dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR, CACNA1S) congenital myopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR, CACNA1S) congenital myopathy
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica, December 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00401-016-1656-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Schartner, Norma B. Romero, Sandra Donkervoort, Susan Treves, Pinki Munot, Tyler Mark Pierson, Ivana Dabaj, Edoardo Malfatti, Irina T. Zaharieva, Francesco Zorzato, Osorio Abath Neto, Guy Brochier, Xavière Lornage, Bruno Eymard, Ana Lía Taratuto, Johann Böhm, Hernan Gonorazky, Leigh Ramos-Platt, Lucy Feng, Rahul Phadke, Diana X. Bharucha-Goebel, Charlotte Jane Sumner, Mai Thao Bui, Emmanuelle Lacene, Maud Beuvin, Clémence Labasse, Nicolas Dondaine, Raphael Schneider, Julie Thompson, Anne Boland, Jean-François Deleuze, Emma Matthews, Aleksandra Nadaj Pakleza, Caroline A. Sewry, Valérie Biancalana, Susana Quijano-Roy, Francesco Muntoni, Michel Fardeau, Carsten G. Bönnemann, Jocelyn Laporte

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 23 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Neuroscience 11 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 24 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,499,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica
#1,543
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,647
of 429,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.