↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting renewable portfolio standard effectiveness: policy design and outcome specification matter

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
Title
Revisiting renewable portfolio standard effectiveness: policy design and outcome specification matter
Published in
Policy Sciences, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11077-013-9175-0
Authors

Miriam Fischlein, Timothy M. Smith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 30%
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 24%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 21%
Environmental Science 7 10%
Energy 4 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2013.
All research outputs
#18,339,860
of 22,711,242 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#411
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,056
of 196,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.