| Title |
Spatial analysis of roadside Acacia populations on a road network using the network K-function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landscape Ecology, July 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1023/b:land.0000036114.32418.d4 |
| Authors |
Peter G. Spooner, Ian D. Lunt, Atsuyuki Okabe, Shino Shiode |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 107 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 39 | 33% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2008.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Landscape Ecology
#844
of 1,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,966
of 59,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landscape Ecology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.