↓ Skip to main content

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
patent
28 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
3067 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Testing in Breast Cancer
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, December 2006
DOI 10.1200/jco.2006.09.2775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio C. Wolff, M. Elizabeth H. Hammond, Jared N. Schwartz, Karen L. Hagerty, D. Craig Allred, Richard J. Cote, Mitchell Dowsett, Patrick L. Fitzgibbons, Wedad M. Hanna, Amy Langer, Lisa M. McShane, Soonmyung Paik, Mark D. Pegram, Edith A. Perez, Michael F. Press, Anthony Rhodes, Catharine Sturgeon, Sheila E. Taube, Raymond Tubbs, Gail H. Vance, Marc van de Vijver, Thomas M. Wheeler, Daniel F. Hayes

Abstract

To develop a guideline to improve the accuracy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing in invasive breast cancer and its utility as a predictive marker.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 <1%
Brazil 7 <1%
United Kingdom 6 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Other 25 2%
Unknown 1087 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 179 16%
Researcher 179 16%
Student > Master 125 11%
Other 103 9%
Student > Bachelor 100 9%
Other 262 23%
Unknown 203 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 410 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 180 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 116 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 3%
Chemistry 28 2%
Other 152 13%
Unknown 233 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,160,600
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,839
of 22,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,897
of 169,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#3
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.