| Title |
Abundance and Borrelia burgdorferi-infection Prevalence of Nymphal Ixodes scapularis Ticks along Forest–Field Edges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EcoHealth, November 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10393-006-0065-1 |
| Authors |
Valerie Horobik, Felicia Keesing, Richard S. Ostfeld |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 18% |
| Researcher | 17 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from EcoHealth
#372
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,023
of 68,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EcoHealth
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.