| Title |
Forest fragmentation predicts local scale heterogeneity of Lyme disease risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, September 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-005-0251-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John S. Brownstein, David K. Skelly, Theodore R. Holford, Durland Fish |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 309 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 68 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 21 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 18% |
| Unknown | 42 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 148 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 49 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#710
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,010
of 71,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#1
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.