| Title |
A review of colloid transport in fractured rocks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mountain Science, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11629-012-2443-1 |
| Authors |
Wei Zhang, Xiangyu Tang, Noam Weisbrod, Zhuo Guan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 15 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#7,499,357
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mountain Science
#54
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,845
of 276,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mountain Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them